![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: View PDF
Confirmation Letter: View
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63345/ijre.v8.i9.1
Syed Feroze Ahamed
Asst. Professor
Anjuman-E-Islam’s
Nehru Arts Science and Commerce College, Ganthikeri, Hubli, Karnataka-580020
Orcid id https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7200-9631
Abstract— Plant cell, tissue, and organ culture systems have emerged as a dependable biotechnological route for the commercial-scale generation of high-value plant materials, including pharmaceutically active secondary metabolites, elite clonal planting stock, and specialty biomass. The productivity of such systems is governed fundamentally by the developmental trajectory of cultured cells, namely the transitions between dedifferentiation, callogenesis, organogenesis, and somatic embryogenesis, and by the biochemical signalling that accompanies these transitions. This paper examines how cellular developmental responses to nutritional, hormonal, and physical culture parameters can be manipulated to enhance biomass accumulation and secondary metabolite yield in economically significant species. A structured experimental framework combining explant selection, hormonal optimization, elicitation, and bioreactor scale-up is presented, and the resulting biomass, metabolite, and genetic fidelity data are analyzed against the applied methodology. The findings indicate that a combined auxin-cytokinin regime supplemented with methyl jasmonate elicitation produces the most favourable balance between growth rate and secondary metabolite titre, while somatic embryogenesis-based propagation offers the greatest genetic stability for long-term commercial multiplication. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating developmental biology insights into industrial bioprocess design.
Keywords— plant cell culture, somatic embryogenesis, secondary metabolites, elicitation, bioreactor scale-up, commercial propagation
References
- Murashige and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 473–497, 1962.
- J. Larkin and W. R. Scowcroft, “Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 197–214, 1981.
- Ramachandra Rao and G. A. Ravishankar, “Plant cell cultures: chemical factories of secondary metabolites,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 101–153, 2002.
- Karuppusamy, “A review on trends in production of secondary metabolites from higher plants by in vitro tissue, organ and cell cultures,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 3, no. 13, pp. 1222–1239, 2009.
- Georgiev, J. Weber, and A. Maciuk, “Bioprocessing of plant cell cultures for mass production of targeted compounds,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 809–823, 2009.
- Y. Paek, D. Chakrabarty, and E. J. Hahn, “Application of bioreactor systems for large scale production of horticultural and medicinal plants,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 287–300, 2005.
- Isah, S. Umar, A. Mujib, M. P. Sharma, P. E. Rajasekharan, N. Zafar, and A. Frukh, “Secondary metabolism of pharmaceuticals in the plant in vitro cultures: strategies, approaches, and limitations to achieving higher yield,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 239–265, 2018.