![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: View PDF
Gaurav Iyer
Independent Researcher
Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational technology (EdTech) platforms has ushered in a new era of personalized learning, real‑time feedback, and data‑driven decision‑making. By leveraging vast troves of student data—including demographic information, performance metrics, behavioral logs, and even affective indicators—AI systems can tailor instruction to individual learning styles, identify at‑risk learners, and optimize pedagogical approaches at scale. However, alongside these pedagogical benefits arise profound ethical challenges concerning privacy, autonomy, equity, and accountability. This enhanced abstract elaborates on the multifaceted ethical landscape, detailing the technological mechanisms of data collection and analysis, the varied stakeholder perspectives on consent and control, and the regulatory frameworks that aim to safeguard student rights. Drawing on a comprehensive mixed‑methods study—comprising a systematic literature review, stakeholder surveys with over 330 participants, and in‑depth policy analysis—this manuscript uncovers key deficiencies in current practice: opaque consent procedures that leave students and guardians uninformed; inconsistent anonymization techniques that expose re‑identification risks; algorithmic biases that can entrench existing inequities; and governance gaps that undermine transparent oversight. The findings underscore a pressing need for layered, interactive consent interfaces; advanced privacy‑preserving technologies such as federated learning and differential privacy; equity audits embedded in development lifecycles; and participatory data stewardship councils that bring together educators, learners, developers, and policymakers. By articulating concrete recommendations for ethically aligned design, this work provides a roadmap for EdTech innovators and institutional leaders to reconcile the competing imperatives of educational innovation and student rights protection, ensuring that AI’s transformative potential is realized in ways that are transparent, fair, and accountable.
Keywords
AI-Based EdTech, Student Data Ethics, Privacy, Informed Consent, Data Governance
References
- Brey, P. (2018). Data governance and accountability in educational analytics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(3), 147–159.
- Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152.
- Lee‑Morrison, L., Ellison, M., & Boyd, D. (2020). Privacy-by-design in educational technology: Are we designing for nobody? Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 395–411.
- Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. UCL Knowledge Lab.
- Mayer, R. C., Matsumoto, D., Greguras, G. J., & Thomas, D. B. (2019). The trust researchers: Investigating how to improve consent processes. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(1), 55–72.
- McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 54, 1273–1282.
- Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450.
- Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2019). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data, and algorithmic decision making in schools. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 117–124.
- Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
- Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529.
- Tsai, Y.-S., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). Complex data governance in educational research: Emerging issues and debates. Computers & Education, 126, 84–99.
- Van den Braak, S., Beetham, H., & Soffer, T. (2020). Developing data literacy to improve teaching in a world of educational data. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1173–1192.
- Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide. Springer.
- Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Objectivity as standardization in data‑scientific educational governance: Grasping the global through the local. Research in Education, 101(1), 69–91.
- Wright, D., & Davies, S. (2018). Student digital privacy and data protection. Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, 1(1), 46–58.
- Zhang, X., & Neill, D. B. (2017). Ensuring fairness in predictive analytics: Limitations and opportunities. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1561–1567.