![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: View PDF
Confirmation Letter: View
Dr. Neeraj Saxena
Professor, MIT colleges of Management
Affiliated to MIT Art Design and Technology University, pune
Abstract
Open Educational Resources (OER) have emerged as a significant lever for democratizing access to quality educational content, especially in contexts where resource constraints limit teacher preparation and continuous professional development. In India, teacher education is simultaneously undergoing regulatory reform, technological disruption, and a push toward inclusive, competency-based curricula. This manuscript investigates how OER are perceived, accessed, integrated, and sustained within Indian teacher education programmes (pre-service and in-service). Drawing on a survey of 100 stakeholders—comprising student-teachers, teacher educators, and academic administrators—this study triangulates quantitative trends with qualitative insights to unpack motivators and barriers to OER adoption. The analysis reveals that while awareness of OER is moderately high, structured integration into pedagogy, assessment, and reflective practice remains inconsistent.
Fig.1 Open Educational Resources,Source([1])
Key facilitators include cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and alignment with local curricular needs; prominent barriers involve digital literacy gaps, inadequate institutional policy support, and concerns about content quality and contextual relevance. The paper concludes with recommendations for institutional capacity-building, policy scaffolding, community-driven curation, and robust evaluation frameworks. It also delineates the scope and limitations of the present study and identifies areas for future research, such as the role of artificial intelligence in OER personalization and sustainable OER ecosystems in multilingual teacher education. Overall, the study underscores OER’s transformative potential when embedded thoughtfully within the socio-cultural and infrastructural realities of Indian teacher education.
Keywords
Open Educational Resources; Teacher Education; India; Pre-service Training; Digital Pedagogy; Policy; Quality Assurance; Survey Research
References
- (2019). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO.
- Wiley, D. (2014). The access compromise and the 5th R. Open Praxis, 6(1), 7–10.
- Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590.
- Hilton, J., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4), 37–50.
- Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Arinto, P. B. (Eds.). (2017). Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South. African Minds; ROER4D.
- Bliss, T. J., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1).
- Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34.
- Bossu, C., Brown, M., & Bull, D. (2012). Open educational resources (OER) in higher education in Australia: A desktop review. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
- McGreal, R. (2017). Special report on the role of open educational resources in supporting the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 292–305.
- National Education Policy 2020. (2020). Ministry of Education, Government of India.
- National Council for Teacher Education. (2014). Norms and standards for teacher education programmes in India.
- Commonwealth of Learning & UNESCO. (2011). Guidelines for open educational resources (OER) in higher education. COL; UNESCO.
- Perryman, L.-A., & de los Arcos, B. (2016). Women’s empowerment through openness: OER, OEP and the Sustainable Development Goals. Open Praxis, 8(2), 163–180.
- Coughlan, T., Pitt, R., & Farrow, R. (2013). Forms of innovation inspired by open educational resources: A post-project analysis. Open Learning, 28(3), 243–256.
- Mishra, S. (2017). Open educational resources: Removing barriers from within. Distance Education, 38(3), 369–380.
- Ministry of Education. (2017). DIKSHA: National digital infrastructure for teachers. Government of India.
- National Repository of Open Educational Resources (NROER). (2013). Central Institute of Educational Technology, NCERT.
- Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton-Detzner, C., & Howell, H. (2010). OER as a model for enhanced teaching and learning. In Proceedings of OpenEd 2010.
- Kanjilal, U. (2013). Open educational resources for open schooling: India case study. Commonwealth of Learning.
- Ghosh, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2018). Integrating OER in Indian teacher education: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(12), 45–53.