Prof.(Dr.) Arpit Jain
K L E F Deemed To Be University
Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh 522302, India
dr.jainarpit@gmail.com
Abstract
This study aims to examine differences between traditional and online pedagogical styles in the context of higher education. The development of digital learning platforms and technological advancements has spurred the expansion of online learning, hence challenging traditional styles. This comparison evaluates various aspects of both pedagogical styles, including student engagement, learning outcomes, accessibility, and pedagogical effectiveness. The research design includes a systematic review of the existing scholarly literature and student and instructor surveys. The findings reveal that both online and traditional learning have strengths and weaknesses, where online learning offers flexibility and accessibility and traditional learning allows more structured interaction. The implications suggest that a blended style, combining the strength of both paradigms, may be the best way to go for future higher education.
Keywords:
Online Learning, Traditional Learning, Higher Education, Pedagogical Effectiveness, Student Engagement, Learning Outcomes, Blended Learning.
References
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
- Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning in online learning environments: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1415-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.022
- Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
- Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R., & Surkes, M. A. (2009). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in postsecondary education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.824
- Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the Community of Inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
- Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
- Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2010). A critical review of the literature on the achievement gap in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 431-467. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0115
- Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education.
- Moore, M. G., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). eLearning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
- Seidman, A. (2012). College student retention: Formula for student success (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000004044
- Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- Vaughan, N. D. (2014). Blended learning: Theoretical foundations and pedagogical approaches. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 97-122). AU Press.