Collaborative Research in Cross-Border MOOC Platforms

Published Paper PDF: View PDF

Preeti Gaur

Independent Researcher

India

Abstract
The globalization of higher education has been propelled by the widespread adoption of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), which facilitate access to high‑quality instruction for millions of learners worldwide. As MOOC platforms evolve beyond content delivery toward vibrant ecosystems of pedagogy, technology, and research, the necessity of robust collaborative research frameworks among international stakeholders becomes ever more pronounced. Collaborative research in cross‑border MOOC initiatives involves multidimensional partnerships—bringing together faculty, instructional designers, data scientists, platform engineers, and policy analysts from diverse institutional and cultural backgrounds. This expanded abstract synthesizes key insights from a systematic literature review, survey data from 120 MOOC course teams across five continents, and case studies of three flagship cross‑border implementations. It outlines the structural, technological, and human factors that underpin successful collaboration: from governance models that clarify roles and rights to interoperable digital infrastructures that streamline data sharing; from intercultural competency training that builds trust to adaptive communication protocols that bridge time zones. The findings highlight persistent barriers—such as regulatory fragmentation, language mismatches, and resource asymmetries—and demonstrate evidence‑based strategies for overcoming them. Notably, research networks built on transparent decision‑making processes and shared learning analytics platforms yield more impactful scholarly outputs, higher learner satisfaction, and greater platform sustainability. This manuscript articulates practical recommendations for educators, platform providers, and policy‑makers aiming to cultivate resilient, equitable, and scalable research ecosystems. It concludes by envisioning a future research agenda that prioritizes learner‑centric design, ethical data governance, and the integration of emerging technologies—such as AI‑driven personalization and blockchain‑based credentialing—to further enhance the global impact of cross‑border MOOCs.

Keywords

Cross‑Border MOOCs, Collaborative Research, Online Learning, Transnational Education, Digital Pedagogy

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT Press.
de Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, L., & Egron‑Polak, E. (2015). Internationalization of higher education. European Parliament.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full Report – Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133–160.
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez‑Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2013). Self‑regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–33.
Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Liminal research: A new paradigm for information systems research. International Journal of Information Management, 32(2), 170–182.
Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses. EduCAUSE Review, 48(3), 62–63.
Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 29369.
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self‑regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48.
Pilli, O., & Admiraal, W. (2016). Collaborative learning in a MOOC: An exploratory case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 380–397.
Reich, J. (2015). Rebooting MOOC research. Science, 347(6217), 34–35.
Tahir, R., Singh, M., & Ellahi, A. (2018). Intercultural competence development through study abroad programs: A systematic literature review. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(2), 547–568.
(2015). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action. UNESCO.
Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198–221.
Zawacki‑Richter, O., Ndume, D., Jonas, M., & Vogt, S. (2019). Discovering MOOC research trends using discourse and text mining techniques. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 1–24.
Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Can e‑learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79.
Zhao, Y., & Breslow, L. (2013). Comparative study of MOOC platforms. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Learning@Scale Conference, 161–162.
Zhu, M., Sari, A. R., & Lee, M. M. (2018). Community‑based learning environment: A case study of Teacher Training MOOCs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 253–267.