![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: View PDF
Yogesh Pawar
Independent Researcher
Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Over the past three decades, India’s educational landscape has witnessed a paradigm shift from centralized administration toward localized governance models, designed to empower communities and enhance accountability. This manuscript delves into the evolution, implementation, and outcomes of decentralization initiatives in school governance, focusing on emerging models such as School Management Committees (SMCs), Village Education Committees (VECs), and Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs). Rooted in decentralization theory, the analysis examines legislative milestones—including the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), and the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA)—and situates them within the broader discourse on participatory governance. A mixed‑methods approach was employed: a quantitative survey of 100 stakeholders (teachers, parents, local administrators) across five diverse states, complemented by thematic analysis of open‑ended responses. Key findings indicate that while SMCs and VECs have significantly improved transparency, resource mobilization, and localized decision‑making, disparities in capacity, political interference, and inequitable resource distribution persist. The study recommends targeted capacity‑building programs for committee members, streamlined fiscal devolution mechanisms, and strengthened safeguards against non‑educational influences. The conclusion outlines avenues for further research, underscores the limitations of the current cross‑sectional design, and highlights the potential for sustainable, context‑sensitive governance reforms to bolster educational equity and outcomes across India.
Keywords
Decentralization, School Governance, India, School Management Committees, Community Participation
References
- Bandyopadhyay, M., & Govinda, R. (2010). Community-based school management in India: Emergent practices and challenges. New Delhi: National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.
- Bray, M. (1999). Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. Oxford: Symposium Books.
- Govinda, R., & Varghese, N. V. (1993). Quality of primary schooling in India: A study of social factors and educational inputs. New Delhi: NIEPA.
- Heller, P., Harilal, K. N., & Chaudhuri, S. (2007). Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala. World Development, 35(4), 626–648.
- Mehrotra, S., & Pattnaik, J. (2011). The limits to school-based management: Lessons from India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 659–677.
- Ministry of Education. (2009). Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan: Framework of implementation. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Ministry of Education. (2001). Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan: Programme guidelines. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Mukherjee, A., & Sharma, P. (2018). Public–private partnerships in Indian school education: Equity and accountability considerations. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 118–125.
- Pandey, M. K., & Patil, V. (2012). School management committees in Maharashtra: Roles and responsibilities. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 58(3), 387–402.
- Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Solutions when the solution is the problem: Arraying the disarray in development. World Development, 32(2), 191–212.
- Rondinelli, D. A. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(2), 133–145.
- Rudra, S. (2013). Impact of decentralization on school performance: Evidence from RBC‑Panchayats. Education Economics, 21(1), 29–45.
- Sharma, K., & Mukherjee, A. (2018). Evaluating equity outcomes in PPP‑run schools in Chhattisgarh. Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 611–630.
- Singh, A. (2015). Capacity building for SMC members: A case study from Rajasthan. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 29(2), 123–138.
- Thoroughgood, J., & Banerjee, S. (2009). The politics of decentralization: Education governance in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(32), 55–61.
- World Bank. (2000). Entering the 21st century: World development report 1999/2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Yadav, M., & Ashok, R. (2016). Evaluating community participation in school development plans: A study in Assam. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 12–23.
- Yadav, S., & Kant, S. (2014). Examining the role of PRIs in school management: Evidence from Uttar Pradesh. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 409–418.
- Zhao, Y., & Santibanez, L. (2009). Decentralization and education outcomes in developing countries: A review of policy experiences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(9), 1–28.