E-Portfolios as an Alternative to Traditional Exams in Higher Education

Certificate: View Certificate

Published Paper PDF: View PDF

Hemant Patil

Independent Researcher

Maharashtra, India

Abstract
E‑Portfolios have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional examinations in higher education, offering a comprehensive, learner‑centered, and technology‑enhanced approach to assessment. Unlike one‑off, high‑stakes exams that primarily measure rote recall, e‑portfolios enable students to curate a range of learning artifacts—projects, reflections, multimedia presentations—that collectively demonstrate growth, competency, and deep understanding over time. This manuscript undertakes a two‑fold investigation. First, it reviews theoretical foundations and empirical evidence comparing e‑portfolio and exam‑based assessments, highlighting benefits such as increased student engagement, development of metacognitive skills, and more authentic evidence of learning. Second, it reports on a mixed‑methods study involving a survey of 100 undergraduate and postgraduate students from diverse disciplines. Quantitative analysis of Likert‑scale data and qualitative thematic analysis of open‑ended responses reveal that students perceive e‑portfolios as more reflective, less anxiety‑inducing, and more aligned with real‑world skills than traditional exams. Identified challenges include higher instructor workload, the necessity for clear rubrics, and technical infrastructure requirements. Based on these findings, the manuscript offers recommendations for successful e‑portfolio implementation, including institutional support measures, faculty development programs, robust technological platforms, and formative feedback strategies. Implications for policy and practice are discussed, along with the study’s scope and limitations.

Keywords

E‑Portfolio, Traditional Exams, Higher Education, Authentic Assessment, Reflective Learning

References

• Barrett, H. C. (2017). Electronic portfolios: A decade of development and future directions. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(1), 11–23.
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2017). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Developing assessment for learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
• Brown, S., & Glasner, A. (2019). Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2018). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.
• Harlen, W. (2017). Principles and big ideas of science assessment. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, 37–48.
  (2021). E‑portfolio toolkit. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk
• Jonassen, D. H. (2018). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem‑solving learning environments. Routledge.
• Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2019). Assessment, learning and employability. McGraw-Hill Education.
• McAllister, D., & Irvine, V. (2020). E‑portfolios and the development of critical thinking: A case study. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 5(2), 45–58.
• Sadler, D. R. (2019). Informing formative assessment: Alignment and adaptation. Routledge.
• Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
• Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2018). Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(8), 19–32.
• Yancey, K. B. (2018). Portfolios in the writing classroom: An introduction. National Council of Teachers of English.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2019). A social cognitive view of self‑regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.