Pedagogical Content Knowledge Among B.Ed. Graduates

Published Paper PDF: View PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63345/ijre.v14.i11.2

Prof. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Bahl

Indus Intenational University

Haroli, Una, Himachal Pradesh – 174301, India

Abstract

This study investigates the level and nature of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) among Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) graduates. PCK, conceptualized by Shulman (1986), represents the unique blend of subject-matter expertise and pedagogical skill that allows teachers to translate academic content into effective classroom practice. As B.Ed. programs are the primary pathway for teacher preparation in many educational systems, evaluating graduates’ readiness in PCK is critical for understanding how well programs equip future educators. Employing a descriptive survey design, this research administered a structured questionnaire to 200 recent B.Ed. graduates from diverse institutions. The instrument measured four PCK dimensions—knowledge of student understanding, instructional strategies, assessment methods, and curricular knowledge—using a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations) and inferential techniques (ANOVA) to explore differences across demographic variables such as specialization, institution type, and academic performance.

Findings reveal moderate to high proficiency in curricular knowledge and assessment methods, but comparatively lower self-reported competence in adapting instructional strategies to diverse learners. Significant differences emerged by specialization (with Science graduates outperforming Arts graduates) and by institution type (public vs. private). The study concludes with recommendations for strengthening pedagogical training components in B.Ed. curricula, such as enhanced practicum experiences focused on differentiated instruction and reflective teaching. Implications for teacher educators, policy makers, and curriculum designers are discussed to foster continuous improvement in teacher preparation programs.

Keywords

Pedagogical Content Knowledge, B.Ed. Graduates, Teacher Education, Instructional Strategies, Assessment Methods

References

Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–13). Springer.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: A tentative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–271.
Friedrichsen, P. J., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Using the content representation (CoRe) as a mediating tool in developing science teachers’ PCK. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 235–258.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Kluwer Academic.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.
Kumar, P., & Rao, M. (2019). An exploratory study on pedagogical content knowledge among teacher trainees in India. Indian Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 45–56.
Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ PCK: Knowledge of students’ conceptions and instructional strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1285–1308.
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Routledge.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Kluwer Academic.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (2008). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for inquiry teaching. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–859). Routledge.
Park, S., & Chen, C. (2012). Identifying and measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in science. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 125–146.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.
Singh, R. (2020). Challenges of teaching practice in B.Ed. programs: Perspectives of student teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(12), 78–86.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college‑ and university‑based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.
Voss, T., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: Analyses of the structure and its relation to students’ achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 1–27.