Role of Digital Thesis Repositories in Research Accessibility

Published Paper PDF: View PDF

Abhay Menon

Independent Researcher

Kerala, India

Abstract
Digital thesis repositories have revolutionized the way graduate research outputs are curated, preserved, and disseminated by institutions worldwide. This section expands upon the foundational overview to explore in depth how repositories facilitate equitable knowledge sharing, support institutional branding, and comply with evolving open-access mandates. Centralized digital archives eliminate geographical and financial barriers, enabling scholars, practitioners, and the public to discover and build upon graduate research. By indexing theses in global discovery services and search engines, repositories dramatically increase visibility and citation potential. Moreover, they serve as platforms for interdisciplinary dialogue, fostering collaborations that transcend departmental silos. However, maximizing these benefits requires addressing persistent challenges: ensuring metadata accuracy and completeness, implementing robust digital preservation strategies (including format migration and bit‑level integrity checks), and devising sustainable funding and governance models. This enhanced abstract outlines the study’s mixed-methods approach—which combines large‑scale analytics of usage metrics with qualitative insights from repository stakeholders—and highlights key findings, including differential access patterns across disciplines, user experience factors influencing deposit compliance, and the critical role of institutional policy in driving repository adoption. The implications extend beyond academia, informing library science, information policy, and the broader movement toward democratized knowledge ecosystems.

Keywords
Digital Thesis Repositories, Research Accessibility, Open Access, Metadata Standardization, Academic Dissemination

References

Armbruster, C., & Romary, L. (2010). Metadata interoperability and standardization—The key to global repository networks. D-Lib Magazine, 16(3/4).
Baykoucheva, S. (2012). Metadata for digital collections: A cataloger’s primer. Information Today, Inc.
Boeker, M., Vach, W., & Motschall, E. (2013). What is the impact of open access on citation rates? A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e79212.
Bryant, F. (2013). Institutional repositories: Managing digital scholarship. Library Technology Reports, 49(5), 6–11.
Chan, L., & Costa, S. (2005). Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries. New Library World, 106(1214/1215), 141–163.
Corrall, S., Kennan, M. A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Metadata actions: Liaisons, librarians and setting repository policy. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 47(4), 391–404.
Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025.
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., & Carr, L. (2010). Self‑selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.
Guédon, J.-C. (2001). In Oldenburg’s long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. Association of Research Libraries Scholarly Publishing Program.
Houghton, J., & Oppenheim, C. (2012). The economic implications of open access to research findings: A study commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. Technical Report.
Khabsa, M., & Giles, C. L. (2014). The number of scholarly documents on the public web. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e93949.
Lynch, C. (2016). Digital scholarship in the age of metrics: Beyond the repository. SPARC Report.
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press.
Suber, P. (2015). Open-access overview: Focusing on open-access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. Retrieved from https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
Swan, A. (2010). The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Technical Report.
Walters, W. H., & Skinner, K. (2011). Analyzing the usage of institutional repositories. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(1), 185–204.
Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. MIT Press.
Xu, F., & Zhang, X. (2016). The impact of policy mandates and institutional support on IR deposit rates. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(3), 224–230.