![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: View PDF
Sunil Bhatnagar
Independent Researcher
India
Abstract
The COVID‑19 pandemic exposed major variability in the readiness of schools and districts to protect health, sustain learning, and maintain operational continuity during large‑scale biological crises. Although most school systems now maintain written Emergency Operations Plans (EOPs), questions remain about the depth, currency, and usability of pandemic‑specific annexes and about the extent to which administrators have received practical, scenario‑based crisis leadership training. Drawing on global guidance (CDC, FEMA, WHO), professional associations (NASP, NGA), and international recovery analyses (UNESCO, OECD, UNICEF), this manuscript examines the state of crisis management training for K‑12 administrators and proposes a readiness model linking plan quality, training dosage, incident command integration, and adaptive leadership competencies. We conducted a cross‑sectional survey of 200 school and district administrators from five national contexts (India, United States, South Africa, Brazil, and Kenya) to gauge training exposure, confidence, and alignment between written EOPs and actual practice. Findings show 88% report having an EOP, but only 52% have a current infectious disease annex updated within 24 months; just 41% completed formal Incident Command System (ICS) or equivalent training; and fewer than half regularly exercise remote learning continuity plans. Administrators who received multi‑modal training (tabletop + functional drill + after‑action review) scored significantly higher on a Pandemic Readiness Index and reported faster decision cycles in simulated scenarios. Implications include embedding pandemic modules in leadership preparation programs, making EOPs living training tools, and aligning school protocols with emerging global pandemic agreements.
References
- Adams, J. E., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). Crisis management in schools: Issues and implications for leadership preparation. (Referenced in crisis leadership synthesis). Invalid URL
- American Journal of Infection Control. (2012). School disaster and pandemic preparedness: National survey using 17 indicators. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(7), 1‑8. Invalid URL
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Responding to COVID‑19: Brief action steps for school crisis response teams (referenced in NASP handout linking to CDC interim guidance). National Association of School Psychologists. org
- National Association of School Psychologists. (2020). Responding to COVID‑19: Brief action steps for school crisis response teams. Author. (Listed separately due to distinct document). org
- National Governors Association. (2021). Crisis leadership: Leading schools in a global pandemic. Author. Invalid URL
- Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools (REMS) Technical Assistance Center. (2022). Collaborating with K‑12 administrators: Engaging leadership in emergency management training. Author. Invalid URL
- S. Department of Education, FEMA, DHS, et al. (2013/2020 update). Guide for developing high‑quality school emergency operations plans. Author. FEMA
- Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Lessons for education from COVID‑19: A policy maker’s handbook for more resilient systems. OECD Publishing. OECD