• ISSN 2320-091X (Online)
  • Monthly since 2012
  • Open access
  • Double blind peer review
editor@ijre.net

State-wise Comparative Implementation of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Missions

Research articleOpen accessVol. 10, Issue 2, January 2021

Download PDFHow to citeDownload citation (RIS)BibTeX

How to cite

Surendra Chauhan (2021). State-wise Comparative Implementation of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Missions. International Journal for Research in Education, 10(2).

Abstract

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) missions under India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 represent a pivotal shift toward ensuring that every child attains basic reading, writing, and arithmetic competencies by the end of Grade 3. This study undertakes a comprehensive, state-wise comparative analysis of FLN implementation across five representative states—Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, and Rajasthan—over the period 2019-2020. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research synthesizes secondary data from government progress reports and standardized learning assessments with qualitative insights drawn from structured interviews of 50 education administrators and classroom observations in 60 schools. Our analysis focuses on key dimensions: policy adaptation and curriculum localization, teacher capacity building, pedagogical innovations, community and parental engagement, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, and early learning outcomes. Results reveal significant heterogeneity: Kerala and Maharashtra exhibit rapid rollouts, robust teacher support systems, and demonstrable gains in reading fluency and numeracy proficiency (improvements of 15–20 percentage points), while Bihar and Rajasthan face persistent infrastructural deficits, limited community participation, and marginal learning improvements (5–8 percentage points). Tamil Nadu’s moderate performance underscores the promise and pitfalls of digital learning pods in resource-constrained rural areas. Through thematic coding of interview data and comparative statistical analysis, we identify critical enablers—state leadership commitment, decentralized management structures, data-driven decision making, and active stakeholder coalitions—and barriers, including procurement delays, socio-economic vulnerabilities, and weak feedback loops.

Keywords: FLN Missions, State-Wise Comparison, Foundational Skills, NEP 2020, Implementation Strategies




References

  • Agarwal, P. (2021). Implementing foundational learning schemes in India: A policy perspective. New Delhi: Educational Publishers.
  • Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2019). Teaching at the right level: Foundational learning interventions. Journal of Development Economics, 138, 25–37.
  • Khera, R. (2020). From inputs to outcomes: Reorienting education policy in India. Mumbai: Academic Press.
  • Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. New Delhi: Government of India.
  • National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2021). Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Framework. New Delhi: NCERT.
  • (2021). Early Learning and Child Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Patel, M., Singh, A., & Rao, P. (2020). State autonomy and educational outcomes in India. Asian Education Studies, 12(1), 99–120.
  • Sen, S., & Das, P. (2021). Mother‐tongue instruction and early literacy development. Language and Education, 35(2), 110–127.
  • Singh, J., & Rao, K. (2019). Comparing early learning outcomes across Indian states. Indian Journal of Educational Policy, 14(4), 211–229.
  • (2017). Global Education Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO.

 

How to cite

Surendra Chauhan (2021). State-wise Comparative Implementation of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Missions. International Journal for Research in Education, 10(2).

Licence

This article is open access, published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. Copyright remains with the authors.

If the issue persists, you can use the old publisher details where you get it published.